Incase it was something anyone was worried about, I am not harvesting any data from anyone. I honestly struggle at times to keep up with regular posts let alone anything nefarious. This blog uses blogger, which is a google program, so whatever the typical data is that google takes, I assume is all that happens. I'm not doing anything beyond that. In the analytics of the blog, I can see things like what link is getting used most often and the region of the world that my readers come from. I can also see what internet application readers are using, but just the actual statistic and nothing specific to any single reader. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to contact me at any of the social medias or email me at thedrstoppagemma@gmail.com and I will help you to the best of my ability.
If you didn't read yesterday's post about Mackenzie Dern and Marina Rodriguez, then you missed that I said my gap in posts was due to midterms and then I took this past weekend to recover, but I will be back to posting regularly now. I know this fight was a few weekends ago and I also said that I wouldn't likely be commenting on it but here we are. I'm not here to talk down on Deontay Wilder as some have done and if you are someone who reads my posts, you know I am not a fight analyst type. I have been open in saying that I don't like boxing as much as MMA nor do I know as much about the sport itself or the fighters. However, what I wanted to comment on was largely a talking point of the broadcast in the lead up to the fight. At least for the American broadcast, they kept mentioning that this fight had a lot to say about Deontay Wilder's legacy and that if he were to lose then they seemed to imply that we would only remember Wilder as the guy who lost to Tyson ...
Comments
Post a Comment